SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Podium Cafe

The Session: Days of the Dope

The Session By Gav Welcome to the Days of the Dope. Really, every day, it’s more doping news. There’s the Contador decision. Which, if you've been underwater for a week, led to a two year ban and the loss of his Tour de France and Giro d'Italia titles for Contador. But don't be sad, he'll be back racing in August.

It's not enough to have a decision. No, we have to have the press conference about the decision. Which! Was fun times, amiright? My favorite part was Riis and The Contract Talk. Riis, he looks so hot when he puts on his Earnest Face. We don’t have a contract with Contador now. Because you know, doping. But we’d really really like to have one in the future. Because ohmigod, he’s so awesome. Just look how awesome he is. We looovveeee him so much.

Raise your hand if you think a contract is already signed? Yes, I think this is entirely possible. And really, you’d hate to see so much love go unrequited.

And then, there’s this. Really, you can’t make this stuff up. You people are seriously going to ride around Spain wearing Contador masks? Boundaries, people, boundaries. Also, we are laughing at you, not with you. Just so you know.

Star-divide

In less amusing matters, the French narcotics police (OCLAESP) paid a visit to the Longo-Ciprelli household on Wednesday. It was not a social call.

The French authorities arrested Patrice Ciprelli, who is accused of buying EPO on the internet. Mise en garde, which is the fancy French word for put in jail pending hearing and other legal stuff. Is it wrong that I always picture this with swords? Or better still, long spears? Not wrong? Good. Anyway, swords aside, this latest news comes rather quickly after the AFLD recently dismissed a case against Jeannie Longo for missed doping controls.

For those of you playing along at home, yes, this is a continuation of the long-running Joe Papp trafficking case. Truly, this case is the gift that just keeps on giving, eh? Amusingly, Ciprelli wasn’t even buying the good stuff, just old-fashioned, first generation EPO. According to reporting by Damien Ressiot (remember him? Oh Damien, so good to see you, how you been?), Ciprelli made two purchases in 2010 and three in 2011. The 2011 purchase reportedly came just before the French National Championship where Longo won the time trial. In another twist, Ciprelli apparently used the address of Longo’s mom for a 2007 shipment.

Less amusing is the inability - or unwillingness? - of doping controls to detect the use of first generation EPO, if in fact, the shipments were used by Longo. Which! We don’t know. I mean, not for sure. They could have been for her dog. Or her mother.

We’ve known for some time that doping controls in women’s cycling are impressive in their absence, though by all accounts the situation is slowly improving. And plenty of riders - including Marianne Vos - have spoken out in favor of more controls with the goals of making women’s racing more fair and more professional. But first generation EPO? How delightfully retro. Does anyone in men’s pro cycling even do that shit anymore? What with the blood doping and the Clen-Clen. EPO? So over.

Of course, retro is all the rage these days. The Court of Arbitration of Sport - the CAS-TAS, which should never be confused with the Cache Cache - announced that it will issue a decision in the Jan Ullrich case. For really? A Jan Ullrich case? I’m tempted to ask Jan, who? But my memory isn’t that bad. He’s that dude who looked crazy fast on a time trial bike and came in second in the Tour de France every year for a while there. I remember! Really I do! But a doping case? Say who-wha? Apparently, this is another gift from Puerto, which is another case that just keeps giving. Anyway, Thursday, there will be a decision on that one case about doping.

On the subject of decisions, did you all do this week’s reading? Because you know there’s going to be a test, right? What reading? Why the Contador case, of course. I mean, they even released it in English. The CAS-TAS, such givers. Hey! CAS-TAS, where was the English on that Valverde case, huh? Too little, too late, that’s what I’m saying.

Anyway, once I got past all that filing shit. Really, could we have condensed that part, or put it in an appendix or something? Yes, we get it! Papers were filed! And translated!

The anonymous witness from 2005-2006, I really wish we got to hear what he had to say. Operation Puerto time, baby! Alas, the court did not find the request for anonymity compelling enough to allow the testimony. Total letdown. Really, I’m just here for the gossip. Legal, shmegal.

“WADA considered it therefore established that the relevant calf was reared and slaughtered in Spain.” Now we’re getting somewhere. I mean, we had the probability talk and now we’re to the cow-killing. Did they use a sword? Because I really want there to be a sword here somewhere.

If there aren’t going to be any swords, maybe TAS-CAS could cut to the chase already? Yes! The arbiters applied strict liability. Lately, they’ve been liking the strict liability. That means, they didn’t exactly claim to know how the Clen-Clen got in the Bert-Bert, but it was there! And since there’s no minimum threshold? There’s no getting around it.

Banhammer! But only until August, because the arbiters decided to apply time-served. Maybe you forgot that part? It was like forever ago, but Contador was suspended provisionally after the positive test was announced in August 2010 and before the Spanish Federation ruled him innocent and before the UCI appealed to the TAS-CAS. TAS-CAS, TAS-CAS, I feel like this should be a song. So, he gets to return to racing faster.

But Contador did lose the Tour de France and the Giro d’Italia. This made him sad, and Andy Schleck only a little less sad. No cause for celebration, said Andy, before going back to his room to play with his unicorns.

Anyway, Contador will be back racing in time for the Vuelta. Maybe even for Saxo Bank. Because Riis really really really wants him. Like so bad. In the meantime, the UCI says maybe Saxo Bank will lose its license. And Vaughters says, oh yeah? Breakaway League. Which, may be like waving a red flag in front of a bull. The UCI, not always doing the smart thing, which would be, avoid the fight, and let Saxo keep racing.

Meanwhile, in Italy, the Giro is crying into the cappucino, because they need a new trophy. Because you know, the results aren’t right anymore. Hey! Giro! The results, they change! Like all the time!

Really, I no longer have any idea who won which race. I look at the results and I think, wait, did that dude test positive, or did I just think he should have tested positive? Or, maybe he tested positive but talked his way out of it? Or, maybe he confessed to attempting to dope and failing rather than actually doping and kept the results? It strains the brain, it does. It’s all a bit surreal. They held a race, and like a party where nobody shows up, nobody actually knows who won.

On the bright side, look at all the doping we’re getting out the way. Done! Gone forever! And hey! Look over there! Boonen won something! See? There’s good shit happening all over the place. You just have to know where to look for it, that’s all.

2 recs  |  85 comments

Comments

Gav, I love you.

One of the few people who can make me laugh about doping.

Also, TOMMEKE TOMMEKE TOMMEKE

Well, Jimbo

is really the only one who can make me laugh about the Tour of Cali course, so there’s that.

Sheer Awesomeness - again!
They could have been for her dog. Or her mother.

This little gem alone was worth the price of admission

Admission?

Did someone admit to something???

Now that would be retro, to admit to something…

Well, to be fair

the 2007 shipment was addressed to her mom. So.

One of your best, if not your absolute best...

…just totally rules, this.

oh shit

I’m so doomed for the rest of the season now. Hello writers’ block, great to see you. Yeah, you know, they said that first one is the best, and now? Fuck if I can write anything else! What do I do?!

Um...

…well that wasn’t the intended effect.

Er… sorry.

:D
Just make shit up like I do

Simple

You are impressively talented

at making shit up. :D

I think that Greg Lemond quotey comes to mind again

It never gets easier… :D

LeMond?

When he said “do you want me to punch Jimbo in the face?”

and Lemond also dreamed of Dairy Queen . . .
Mmm, blizzards....
Bah

Like LeMond has any idea how annoying I am… I wish…

I can't wait to find out how many of you choose Bert (and how you do) in FSA DS...

The conversation about where he might end up come August was sure interesting with the prospect of no team points being offered up and a likely pay cut. A story that will continue to be interesting, never mind what happens with Saxo.

Fun read for a dope like me!

Saturday group ride, and I going as Contador.
Photos, or it didn't happen :D
I'll be on plane, plus I've never been a supporter.

But someone else should do it. Gav, should wear it surfing. :)

I will pay for your peanuts

If you print this out and wear it on the plane ride.

Hopefully this helps explain to Europeans why we Americans prefer to jam our fingers in our ears and say "Nanana I am not listening~!" when a certain topic involving a certain one-balled cyclist arises

Nobody takes too kindly to their favorite sons being messed with. Even if it’s justified.

Fun fact: The phrase "one-balled cyclist" gives 33 Ghits

This being one of them. I’d have guessed it would be higher.

Contador is probably the biggest fish, but many Europeans have felt the situation before:

Pantani
Ullrich
Hell, even on a small scale, a large portion of the Danish population is still behind Michael Rasmussen.and strongly believe he is a TdF winner.

And the Kazakhs were ready to put Voldekourov into public office

It would gratify me to know that this is widely understood.

Digging for dopers.

Ullrich – a blast from the past. Will there be a book deal?

Who’s the winner? Gave that game up long ago, now its all down to real time entertainment.

Ulle often said that when the press finally leave him alone, he'll sit down and write a book ...

seems happy with life, looking at his webpage … http://www.janullrich.de/
Whether the eunoch did or didn’t, he’s still an inspiration to many – that’s more important

I am so glad that this is near its end for Ulle. It feels like he's been in the wilderness for years.
is he

still selling bikes?

Less amusing is the inability – or unwillingness? – of doping controls to detect the use of first generation EPO

The prob with EPO is you still have the same narrow window of opportunity to test for its use: within days of use. Sure, if the test is done in the right wndow, you should spot Gen-1 EPO (though remember the dffics of the test, the high margin of error, the extra paddng for beneft of the doubt, and the fact that two labs have dfficulty agreeing the same result). But, of course, micro-dosing throws you into that whole margine of error / benefit of the doubt grey area. All the good money in dope testing is gone longtitudinal, cause that’s where sport is at. Well the elite men’s sport: how many women are part of the passport programme (or any passport programme in cycling? Are Cervélo still testing their riders? Can any woman’s team afford/justify an independent anti-dopng programme?). But we have to ask at this stage what use is longtitudinal doing? iPat keeps promising cases are in the pipline, but that pipeline just seems to get longer and longer and longer.

right

But that was kind of my point – there’s very very limited out-of-comp monitoring on the women’s side. So yeah, chances of actually catching someone are not so awesome, because most of the testing is in-comp.

Agreed we’re agreeing, I just use more words than you. In spirit of Dickens :)

Re limited OOC testing – even more limited when someone invconveniently neglects to inform star rider that she’s a member of the RTP.

Inconvenient,

does that word mean what you think it means? ;)

Bah inconsistency.

Ullrich’s results get stripped when Valverde’s weren’t?

CAS writes
80. Article 313 of the new UCI Rules provides that in addition to a period of ineligibility," all other competitive results obtained from the date a positive Sample was collected… or other anti-doping rule violation occurred, through the commencement of any Provisional Suspension or Ineligibility period, shall, unless fairness requires otherwise, be Disqualified."
81. The evidence presented by the UCI shows that Ullrich’s intensive involvement with Dr. Fuentes’ doping program goes back to at least 2004, and likely substantially earlier. Although the date at which Ullrich’s doping cannot be determined, there is clear evidence Ullrich was fully engaged with Dr. Fuentes’ doping program by the spring of 2005.
82. In view of Article 313 of the new UCI Rules, this Panel disqualifies the results of Jan Ullrich from all sporting events in which he competed from May 1, 2005 until the time of his retirement.

In Ullrich’s case it’s results between May 2005 and June 2006. In Valverde’s case, the information they had was not anywhere near the same as in Ullrich’s, and perhaps “unless fairness requires otherwise” means they cannot strip Valverde’s results from that time. Though I don’t remember what CAS argued in his case.

understandable "inconsistency"

one there is the epo laden blood bag in an office, no real evidence of actual use and “no evidence that any results since 6th May 2006 until now was through doping infraction”

the other there is “clear evidence Ullrich was fully engaged with Dr. Fuentes’ doping program by the spring of 2005”

Uh...how exactly do you think the EPO got into Valverde's blood if he wasn't using it?
am only quoting or paraphrasing CAS decisions

Valverde convicted for one bag having epo in on a set date. Panel said “on strength of this finding it is not necessary to go into other possible offences….(before or after)”
Punishment appropriate to what he was convicted of. Do I think that was all it was about – no. Is it all he got busted for – yes.

Different altogether with Ullrich across the board.

Only different because they didn't go into the 'other possible offenses'...which would have been identical to Ullrich's.
Right, at some point, parsing the decisions needs to give way to just throwing up our hands...

…and saying “what the fuck?”

Not sure when that point comes, exactly, but I have a feeling it’s not so far off.

Ja, good point

I remember the UCI wanted TAS to clear all of Valverde’s results back to 2006, but TAS refused. I’d have to go back to the decision to remember why that was so.

Have we at least now reached the point when we can stop writing cycling results in pencil?
Wait...

Valverde’s results weren’t stripped? I thought they were – or at least some of them were? Aye carrumba. Like I said, I don’t even know who won anything anymore.

This is what I have, from 2010 VDS notes on AV:

“Suspended retroactively from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2011 at 05/31/2010. Points from 2010 are annulled.”

Yeah

I thought he lost the 2010 results.

Lost 2010, kept 2009

Which is just all kinds of ass-backwards, though I was hoping it could somehow set a precedent for Bert to lose 2010 but keep 2011. Obviously we know how that worked out.

While all this doping news is distressing

if a few (ok, very, very many) more results get stripped, I could end up a GT winner!! Yay me! (you don’t actually have to ride in the event to win, do you?)

provisional out-of-competition champion
Have to laugh if Armstrong gets stripped

and Ulrich becomes a TdF winner

Armstrong's not going to be stripped (ewwww mental image)

And Ulrich already is a TdF winner.

Slippery slope

where do you stop?

whenever a french dude gets the win?
Tip for GT organizers: Use pencil to write in the names of the winners from now on.

Clearly a lot to learn.

So that's a no to my above comment then? ;\
I missed your comment. I thought the cn link said Ullrich would have his 3rd removed.
Yeah, his results from '05 and what little he rode in '06 are toast

My comment was hoping that NOW we are in a time period where results can begin to be written in pen.

I lack faith we're ready for pen again. It's actually distressing how much the results have been "modified".
This is completely ridiculous.
(I meant the state of things, not your comment)
I am rather ridiculous too...but we do agree...

Excellent ! I am now less dopey about doping.

But only until August, because the arbiters decided to apply time-served.

Actually they decided to apply “time-gone-by” versus ‘time-served" since he spent a lot of that time racing GT’s. :)

I think that's actually referring to the "provisional ban"

Between when the adverse clen test was announced to when RFEC did their thing. Even though all that really was was Bert’s season being over. I’m not convinced he’d have started 2011 any earlier anyway.

Nah

It’s that bit where he was provisionally suspended. Like I said, it was forever ago, so you can be totally forgiven for having forgotten about it.

But isn’t it a 2 year suspension from August 2010 – and didn’t he race the Giro and TdF in 2011?

Sorry if I am mixed up. Just seems like part of his “suspension” was spent racing.

It's two years from the date the Spanish federation first proposed a one-year ban

Jan 25, ‘11, with “time served” already taken out. If that makes sense to anyone other than CAS, I’d like to know how.

speaking of dopes

have you guys seen Jens’ latest upload to youtube?

Since 2007 I've been trying to explain something about Norwegians here

I now feel like there is no need for further explanation.

Is this ad

for or against vodka?

This is why Sweden still has an army
In a short update

over at l’équipe, Ciprelli has apparently confessed to having purchased EPO. But! Not so fast! He claims it was for personal use. Maybe he just wanted to do sex better.

il nous prend pour des cons.
slaughtered calf

Wait, that was literal? I thought this was a biblical metaphor.

That's a lamb, isn't it?
Potato, lamb.

Mmmmmmm.

the mint jelly

is not the issue here.

slaughtered calf

Lower leg caught in the chain

Metaphors, reality

is there a difference?

all this sword talk... I always wanted a cool sword

It’s all guns around here, but no swords.

I feel like

there could be some fun to be had with a sword, yes.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Podium Cafe to post a comment.