
So, your classics squad is totally set by now, right? No? You're going to keep obsessing over the results in Oman until the deadline to see if you can figure out who is going to be really hot versus only kinda good and who is going to tango with the pavement before Het Nieuwsblad? Okay, I understand.
But, unless you plan on picking up the top 15 places in every race between now and the middle of April, you need to think more broadly. Besides, just think about all those delectable points on offer in stage races, the Ardennes, Lombardia, San Sebastian, and more! So, I take you through five of my favorite climbers and stage racers to give you some advice that will surely come back and haunt me in the final VDS standings.

The epitome of the pure climber, J-Rod does nothing good but go uphill. He is pint sized, explosive, and dogged in his attacks. He has also been one of the most consistent VDS performers in the past several years. He was the third highest points scorer in 2011 and the second highest in 2010.
Pros: Consistency. For years, J-Rod lacked big, headlining victories but was on innumerable podiums. Then he got even better. J-Rod pulls points all season long in Classics, Grand Tours, smaller stage races - you name it, if it has a hill, he's scored there. To illustrate, lets look at last year: his first win was a stage of the Tour of Basque Country in April, he nabbed second in both Amstel and Fleche Wallone, finished 3rd overall at the Giro, won two stages at the Dauphine along with the points and KOM competitions, took a short break in mid summer, and came back with a vengence to win the overall and a stage at the Vuelta a Burgos and two stages at the Vuelta. Phew! Also, that is a typical season.
Also, nobody likes the 2012 Vuelta route as much as Purito. Except maybe Contador, but that's for another reason.
Cons: Value. If he has a similar season, he will be produce 85-95 points per salary unit. That's pretty good. But, he is unlikely to exceed expectations and produce "extra" points. He's a good foundation for a team, but that means everyone and their mother will have him.
Uran is exploding in a big way. 240 points in 2010, 887 in 2011. He's climbing through the elite echelons of the sport like a scalded cat. He's leading the next wave of Colombian domination of any and all mountain stages in races.
Pros: Uran is one of the big promises in the youthful generation of the sport. He is 25 years old and has been getting better and better since his first pro season in 2006. All indications point to him maturing in a big way over the next few seasons. He was 5th in Liege-Bastogne-Liege last year, was leading the best young rider's competition in the Tour de France until he got sick with a few days to go, and notched top-5 finishes at the GP Quebec, the Giro dell'Emilia, and the Volta a Catalunya. He's pulled off results of this caliber since 2006, but he's doing so much more consistently now.
Cons: Low value. If he merely replicates his 2011 season, Uran will only net an efficiency ratio of 74 points per salary unit. If you compare that to many of the other riders at the top of the sport, that's low. Evidently the pricing gods expect him to get as good as I think he will. Also, he'll have competition for Wiggins for leadership in a number of races. Hopefully they can divide and conquer outside of July, where Uran will be sheparding Wiggins up the mountains.
6 points! 6 points! This from a dude who looked like he was totally going to place in the top 5 of the Tour last year before his hopes literally came crashing down.
Pros: He's Belgian, but he doesn't ride the cobbles! But seriously, VDB is one of the big names poised to make the biggest jump in his points-earned column in 2012. If he performs up to expectations in the Tour alone, he will have almost 400 points to his name. And he tore up the Dauphine last year.
Cons: All the unknowns. If you pick up VDB, it will be because you think he has made enough progress in the last two years to truly ratchet up his performance. He scored 455 and 450 points in 2010 and 2011, but the second data point is a huge question mark. Many people would say he was a level above his 2010 form, but we don't know for sure. Also? The dude is hardly seen after July. All that talent being put out in the pasture until spring, such a shame.
Andy's older brother, or, the Schleck brother who doesn't daydream about ponies until the Tour. He's got class - he finished on the third step of the podium at last year's Tour and would stand a very good chance at winning the Giro this year if he targeted it. He goes uphill fast enough to finish in the top 5 of the Ardennes and almost any Grand Tour he gets to play leader for if he's on form.
Pros: Unlike Andy (and I do like Andy, I'm just not as enamored as I once was), Frank races his bike all year long. Or, longer than Andy does, at least. As a result, he pulls in more VDS points - about 300 more last year, and they are the same price this year! Additional bonus? Mean Uncle Johan might split them up this year (hopefully) and send Frank to the Giro. Cross your fingers, people.
Cons: He may be surgically attached to Andy come Tour time, keeping either of them from jumping away to a stage win and up the GC. Also, Andy is cuter. And Frank crashes a lot.
Also, it's Andy's turn to win the Luxembourg national title in the road race, so that's -100 points for Frank.
Say hello to the darling of Italian cycling!* Who doesn't love the grin sexy Ivan gets when he starts going hard? And those massage videos, oh those massage videos... (you're welcome, Gav)
So, why else should you give signore Ivan a look this VDS season?
Pros: He's cheap! Seriously, at 10 points this dude is a steal. Why? Because he is going to win the Giro. Last year he only achieved 80 points per salary unit, but that's also because he bypassed the Giro in favor of the tour, where he finished 8th. Do you know how many more points are on tap for winning? Hell, I bet Ivan makes almost 800 points out of the Giro alone.
Cons: Cons? What are you talking about? I guess you could choose to abstain because he has a tainted past, but I forgave Ivan for that long ago and think he's totally clean now. And if you lack a Y chromosone, you probably did too.
*Moms who are fans of cycling, that is.
Uran and Schleck photos by Michael Steele (Getty Images Sport); Basso photo by Bryn Lennon (Getty Images Sport)
0 recs | 90 comments
First!
No love for the Dutchies?
RollinRollinRolland - February 15, 2012
i have loads of climbers, at least for now
JessicaH - February 15, 2012
That couldn't be Cadel could it? No, it can't be. GHH?
Seahorse - February 15, 2012
neither
JessicaH - February 16, 2012
Would they be riding for Lampre?
muk - February 16, 2012
you do realize there are many of aussies out there, right?
//winks.
plus my list is sort by country.
JessicaH - February 17, 2012
Lloyd?
I was thinking of an Aussie who can climb, that isn’t Evans….
muk - February 17, 2012
Now here's a VDS post that does well to describe my team!
I already have 3 of these guys. I’d be a tad bearish on Urán Urán, given that he’s gonna be Bradley’s right-hand man in July. He may still have plenty of opportunities to ride for himself, but the biggest race of the year won’t be one.
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
J-Rod is a class act. No question.
Very tempted, but it would drive a significant change in strategy (really?) to take him on. Like Double Uran very much, but the boy is on the wrong team. Not enough opportunities imo.
Uphill - February 15, 2012
I see what you mean about Uran. On the other hand,
he will be a major player in the Ardennes, Lombardia, the WC… As far as the tour, he’s a classier rider than Wiggens, at least I think so. Add Froome into Sky’s TdF mix, a young guy who quite likely believes he’s better than Wiggens too – and he very well may be – and anything can happen. Just to be on the safe side, though, there’s always VDB or Menchov for example, reasonably priced guys, who can augment the TDF line up. In any case, i think Uran is good for 1000+
sebastiandeluded - February 15, 2012
Well, in terms of liking: Uran > Froome > Wiggo.
Will Uran get all the opportunities in the hilly classics? perhaps. One thing I am sure about however is this: Sky will ride for Wiggo and Cav in the Tour. The entire sponsorship hinges on this idea.
Both VDB and Menchov looks good, however I do think Menchov needs to show up in more than one race, i.e. TdF to really get a solid return.
Uphill - February 15, 2012
That is the problem - if they are taking a 5-man leadout for Cav
then Wiggins likely gets 2 climby domestiques, Uran, maybe Xandio, and maybe Porte.
So Sky are surely likely to run Uran’s training schedule in a way that he peaks in July to help Wiggo the most. This means he will not be at his peak at the other races where he is allowed to ride for himself.
His 2011 points total was partly attributable to Wiggins’ crash – they turned to breaks. And it was the most visible Team Sky have ever been.
ike2112 - February 15, 2012
yes, Sky looked very good last year race wise, but the action didn't
fill the papers in the UK much.
Uran could pay off, but he is risky compared to others imo.
Uphill - February 15, 2012
What about Froome?
It was my understanding that he was going to ride the tour. Have plans changed?
sebastiandeluded - February 15, 2012
Does Wiggins really need too many climbing domestiques though?
He is a diesel climber. It’s not like he needs an uphill leadout to make moves like Schleck and Contador. He just needs a domestique to pace him if he gets dropped. Outside of that he is following wheels and resting up for the TT.
lieutenantmudd - February 15, 2012
If Wiggins really has ambitions to win the tour
he will need some help, if others attack early he will need teammates reeling them back in, especially if other teams arn’t interested, or at least to help keep any damage to a minimum. He believes he can win the Tour and to do so he will need his team to support him when others are trying to rough him up in the mountains.
wooley7 - February 15, 2012
He'll need support, I'm not saying that
Everyone needs support. I am just saying, I don’t think he is an elite enough climber to really worry about tactics in the climbs. Not at the Tour at least.
lieutenantmudd - February 15, 2012
Exactly
If Cadel can win with barely a BMC team-mate being sighted when mountain splits happened, Wiggins should be able suffice with two or three of Froome/Uran/Rogers/Porte
RollinRollinRolland - February 16, 2012
I agree with this,
I was thinking of stage 18 last year and I am not sure Wiggins could do what Cadel did to rescue that situation, he would need a little help and two or three guys should be enough.!
Saying that, if Wiggins had still been in the race he and Evans would have had each other to work with.
wooley7 - February 17, 2012
Double Uran
may not get the opportunities in the GT’s but I believe he will get them in the hilly spring classics, Canadian races, WC and Lombardia. If he continues to improve the way he has he should be looking at well over 1000 points this season.
I really think Wiggins doesn’t get the credit he deserves, last year he finished 7/8th in UCI points list despite crashing out of his main target. A win in the dauphine and 3rd in La Vuelta, on a route which really didn’t match his climbing style, goes to show the calibre of rider he has become on the road. With this years Tour route he has a great chance of a high finish in Paris, maybe a podium, and is surely nailed on for top 5’s in both the WC and Olympic TT’s along with some high finishes in other week long races.
Not expecting a massive profit from him on his 18 point salary but injuries aside he will surely get near the points he gained last year…..or am I just trying to convince myself that he is 18 points well spent?
wooley7 - February 15, 2012
Agree, Wiggo at 18 looks good.
Now to take on a top rider with a style I don’t like will cause a major headache.
Uphill - February 15, 2012
I think Froome at 10 is better than Wiggens at 18.
Wiggens crashed out of the tour but more than made up for points lost in the Vuelta. Wiggens looked good for a top 5 in the tour but maybe not 3rd. Call it a wash.
sebastiandeluded - February 15, 2012
I am still not so sure about Froome.
A great ride in La Vuelta but nothing else to back that up…..yet!
The comparison between to two at last years Vuelta, I think, is unfair. Froome peaked for the race where as Wiggins just did what he could to be in as good a shape as possible. The defining climbs of La Vuelta were just too steep for Wiggins and he looked very tired in the last week.
IMO Wiggins looks a safe bet to score similar to last season and I agree at 10 points Froome could be a real bargain but more of a risk.
wooley7 - February 15, 2012
I agree with you.
I do think that in terms of points, Froome + say, Taaramäe or Kruijswijk > Wiggens.
sebastiandeluded - February 15, 2012
Froome did great
But the 2012 Tour ain’t going to be as easy (field wise) as the 2011 Vuelta. I’d look for someone who performs more consistently throughout the year.
lieutenantmudd - February 15, 2012
I've yet to see the article on picking a few riders you like and then anyone you've heard of to fill in the rest of the gaps
That said I’ve got one of these here and am currently looking to see if I can squeeze a second in.

randomgerbil - February 15, 2012
Only one rider you like in that team, you mean?
I guess it’s a win-win situation: they do well, you’re winning FSA-DS; they do badly, chuckle time.
tedvdw - February 15, 2012
I meant one rider from the 5 mentioned above
And that was my thoughts, it’s slowly moving away from my strategy above as over competitiveness takes hold but I suspect a fair few favourites who will then go on to do terribly will hang on.
randomgerbil - February 15, 2012
Ah yes of course
sorry for the confusion.
tedvdw - February 15, 2012
thanks for post
It seems to me that the Queen climbing stage for the entire 2012 season will be the Giro’s mountain top finish of Stelvio – assuming weather is OK – it’ll be the highest finish ever in a big race.
So who do people think can win this stage?
Willj - February 15, 2012
I'm presuming it'll potentially be the only time we see Rujano all year?
ike2112 - February 15, 2012
Henao
broerie - February 15, 2012
+ I hope... ;o)
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
Who will win that stage? Probably the breakaway
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
no way
too big a climbing day (I think)
Willj - February 15, 2012
The breakaway won the queen stage at last year's Giro
Not the very first breakaway, no, but one that formed at 50 km. Same diff.
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
Climbers?
We’re supposed to have climbers?
Oh, shit.
majope - February 15, 2012
On the other hand, my team usually rules Eneco.
majope - February 15, 2012
Which is all that really matters
tgsgirl - February 15, 2012
I heart Eneco stage altitude profiles
B————————
B = Bridge
Willj - February 15, 2012
Densel this is a copy of my team climbers...!
You can add another 7 or 10 more to my team… I will suck in classics (maybe) but I will be top 5 in every single GT..!
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
I like climbers
but I only have 2 of these. Considering to add Older Schleck, hmm… dunno.
gizzardfanny - February 15, 2012
Added Schleck.
Now team looks like this:

gizzardfanny - February 15, 2012
You are missing the Colombian flags... he he
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
Yeah, he was sacrificed.
Still no Danes or Argentinians.
gizzardfanny - February 16, 2012
I like to play with the flags...
Here it is Argentinian Gauchos & CO.
"/>
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
Well after reading again...
I have in this team: 2 pure sprinters, 1 TT specialist 2 guys that can surprise you during classics (doubt that) domistics.. And the rest is just very good GCs guys… Good climbers, good all arounders…
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
Tough to separate GC vs Pure climbers when talking the Grand Tours.
Evans could be a climbing pick?
Willj - February 15, 2012
So GC and Climbers don't go together?
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
I suppose GC guys are always good climbers. But often you good pure climbers that are better than GC guys but could never win a GT.
Willj - February 15, 2012
I think I get the difference.
but you can’t win a GT without being a good climber either right?
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
Well, you can't be an *embarrassment* of a climber
But Paolo Savoldelli won two Giri d’Italia, and I wouldn’t exactly call him a climbing ace.
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
Got it...
Now I have to google that name.
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
The best descender ever
Willj - February 15, 2012
Stage 19 of the 2005 Giro
Stage 19 of the 2005 Giro: An intriguing day in the mountains if ever there was one …
It would have been much easier to cheer for him at the time if he wasn’t wearing a Discovery Jersey
muk - February 15, 2012
Huh, I didn't know Rujano rode for Quick Step
Aly Edge - February 16, 2012
Neither did Rujano
TheFigurehead - February 16, 2012
It's a typo?
1 José Rujano Guillen (Ven) Quickstep – Innergetic 05:49:30 (32.64km/h)
Aly Edge - February 16, 2012
If I recall correctly
He signed up for them basically just for the Giro.
He wasn’t the only struggling in a new team that day, Van Huffel rode the latter parts of that stage quite clearly in the employ of Bruyneel and Team Discovery……
muk - February 16, 2012
Rujano wasn't with Quick Step in 2005...that was 2006
He rode a few races with them after doing the Giro with Androni (he DNFed the Tour and got let out of his contract at the end of October ’06)
Vlaanderen90 - February 17, 2012
Ahhh
I knew it was something funky like that In my defense it was more than a week ago – the half life of my memory these days ….
muk - February 17, 2012
It was a typo that time...but he had a terrible time with QS the next year
Vlaanderen90 - February 17, 2012
Actually half that link is a typo...
So many of the rider’s teams are screwed up
Vlaanderen90 - February 17, 2012
It was a joke
Pretty much like Rujano’s stint at QS was a joke
TheFigurehead - February 17, 2012
no. but he could descend like a dream.
umwolverine - February 15, 2012
Similar skills make David Arroyo a possible GT winner if it's not too too climb-happy
Say, this year’s Tour route with one ITT rather than two.
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
Similar skills plus 13 minutes
might make David Arroyo a possible GT winner.
straw dog - February 15, 2012
On *that* route, yes, he needed 13 minutes
But on one of the ones where Savoldelli won? I could see it happening.
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
Arroyo was a fluke...he won't see the business end of a GT again
unless he gets time on his side…plus he is not as good of a climber, imo, as savoldelli ever was
Vlaanderen90 - February 15, 2012
I think I will add "Giri"
to my cycling vocabulary. Has a nice sound.
straw dog - February 15, 2012
It *is* the correct Italian plural
I just don’t like “Giros,” though for god sake don’t say “Giro d’Italias” That will make me want to hunt you down if you do.
Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
I will reserve "giros"
for unemployment benefit cheques
straw dog - February 15, 2012
I read giro and became hungry...
my belly is worst then me when it comes to spelling…
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
like andy?
oh, nevermind.
ant1 - February 15, 2012
You mean 2010 TdF Champion Andy?
:)
Willj - February 15, 2012
2010 TdF Champion?
Has the race jury finally docked Contador 39 seconds for unsportsmanlike behaviour on Stage 15?
Does Andy win on countback?
straw dog - February 15, 2012
Cadel?
2nd on Monte Zoncolan in 2010. Yeah, he’s a climber.
lieutenantmudd - February 15, 2012
He could - I simply chose to focus on the more purebred of the climbers
Basso isn’t quite a purebred, but he has been a stronger climber than TTer since his return
Douglas Ansel - February 15, 2012
And I may have wanted an excuse to use that pic of Basso.
Douglas Ansel - February 15, 2012
Dan Martin
Basically a young Irish J-Rod.
lieutenantmudd - February 15, 2012
+1
Class material.
Uphill - February 15, 2012
J-Rod to me is like a Cav going up the hill.
Am I wrong?
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
Martin and Rodriquez are very similar riders
And I wouldn’t classify them as pure climbers. They are more like the sprinters of the mountains. Steep and 100 yards to go? Either if your man.
I think of pure climbers more as the kind of riders who can climb the whole mountain faster than you. Martin and Rodriquez are very competent here too, but there’s a lot of riders who I think could outclimb them on a long mountain stage.
Riders like Contador and Schleck are so good at GT mountain stages because they are both. They are fantastic climbers, but can also sprint away from the others who are just good enough to stay in the slipstream.
lieutenantmudd - February 15, 2012
Small correction
Rodriguez was
5th4th at the ’11 Giro. He was4th3rd at the ’10 Vuelta.Aly Edge - February 15, 2012
How come he got moved up to 4th in the Giro?
Did I miss something?
straw dog - February 15, 2012
Contador removal.
Speaking of 4th in the Giro, the guy who is now 3rd should go in here. John Gadret is a pretty pure climber.
As is Igor Antón, of course, whose tendency to get injured means he’s perpetually cheaper than he should be, and therefore always tempting, only for him to get injured again.
Henao will be very, very good.
UrlaubinPolen - February 15, 2012
Henao sucks people..!
Don’t pick him..! Too expensive..! Not good guy…! (Did anyone buy that?)
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
no
umwolverine - February 15, 2012
made my night worst...
He is going to be in every VDS team… right?
pablo777 - February 15, 2012
If you believe the 3 of us is a representative sample
Then yes. Yes, he is.
Douglas Ansel - February 15, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Podium Cafe to post a comment.