A lot of ink was spilled a year ago or more regarding the unfortunate turn of events Vacansoleil faced in 2010 as it bid to become the Netherlands' other Pro Tour Team. The springboard it selected was the presence of the world's two biggest races, the 2010 Giro d'Italia and Tour de France, launching themselves on Dutch soil, at some cost to the good people of the Netherlands. Padding their case was their presence in the 2009 Vuelta a Espana, also starting in Holland, where the team had ridden decently enough, including a stage win. But the Giro and the Tour were unimpressed, thumbing their noses at Vacansoleil, and even the Vuelta kicked them while they were down with a disinvite for their 2010 running.
This sequence of events meant that someone owed them a solid, and the UCI stepped up with a Pro Tour license for 2011, which the team put to good use. For a freshman campaign, Vacansoleil demonstrated that they had at least as good a reason to be in the Big Show as any of the teams occupying the bottom half of the Pro Tour lineup. For the Podium Cafe Rankings, they came in 8th overall, ahead of fancier outfits Saxo Bank, Liquigas, Quick Step, Lampre, BMC and Radio Shack. CQRanking had them 6th, nipping at the heels of neighboring giant Rabobank, and coming around Katusha and Gilbert's Omega Pharma. And miles beyond Geox too... meaning they were superior overall to each of the three teams who won one of the 2011 Grand Tours.
Call 2011 the year Vacansoleil walked the talk.

Vacansoleil weren't the subject of an Offseason Capsule last winter, but the consensus was that things weren't in great shape. The grand tour exclusions were a cruel blow, and to make matters worse, they had tried to bolster their case by signing Zeke Mosquera, fresh off his Vuelta battle which saw him second overall... at least until the lab turned up hydroxyethyl starch in his blood. So Vacansoleil, which already had foolishly offered a contract to perpetual scofflaw Ricardo Ricco and taken back Bjorn Leukemans from his six-month suspension for testosterone in 2009, was taking on the air of a dirty team -- a sure-fire way to get doors slammed in your face. At least if you're poor.
That said, even assuming Ricco wouldn't contribute anything, Leukemans was teaming with Stijn Devolder, Marco Marcato and Johnny Hoogerland for the Classics, where they were bound to cause trouble. And their sprinter lineup of Borut Bozic and Romain Feillu would presumably translate into points.
Vacansoleil were one of those teams which make a case for a points system, as opposed to looking for who got sexy wins. They missed out on pretty much all of those, unless you get excited about the Dutch Nats (which I kinda do) or stages of the Tour de Suisse (again, yeah). But if you paid closer attention, you could see plenty of quality.
Leukemans, the team's top scorer (at the VDS; second to Marcato at CQ), did finally score a trio of wins at the Tour du Limousin (stage and overall) and Overijse Druivenkoers late in the season. Prior to that, all he had done was finish 7th in Flanders, 13th in Paris-Roubaix, second in a sprint to Gilbert at Brabantse Pijl, 7th at Amstel Gold, and 9th at Liege-Bastogne-Liege. Comparitively few riders even pull off the double of starting Paris-Roubaix and Liege-Bastogne-Liege, let alone meaningfully contesting them both. But Leukemans is a hybrid of a classics rider, as he proved again by mixing it up with the climbers in Quebec and Montreal later in the year.
Marcato had his own multiple, diverse run of almost-spectacular form, highlighted by a second in a classic-like Paris-Tours (as opposed to the bunch sprint version); victory in the Tour de Vendee; third overall in the Tour of Poland with several high stage finishes, both climbing and sprinting; and some sprints in L'Etoile de Besseges, including a second where he beat Hutarovich. Romain Feillu's eight wins beefed up their points. Johnny Hoogerland nearly joined Leukemans on the podium at Brabantse Pijl.
But the really good news was the development of the young climbers. Wout Poels transformed himself from a backbencher to a 24-year-old climbing star in the making. All year long Poels kept the company of the top riders in the sport, whether it was following Contador up a stage in Murcia or taking two second places in stages of the Vuelta a Espana. Poels was getting some results in 2010 in places like the Tour de L'Ain and Tour of Britain. But when he summited the Alto de L'Angliru second only to JJ Cobo, he had officially arrived. Meanwhile, Rob Ruijgh's first taste of a grand tour was when he placed 21st at the Tour de France. He was more steady than spectacular, but that's an impressive result.
The biggest downer, apart from an epic victory someplace, was the performance of Stijn Devolder. There was a story in Sporza the other day about how Devolder is working with a coach who now blames his terrible form on erroneous training -- too much training, if anything, as the story suggests Devolder would go out too hard too early, then try to train even harder when his form didn't come around. This excuse reminds me of those job interview moments where they ask you your biggest weakness and you're supposed to say something about how "I guess it's that I care too much sometimes about my work." Then again, he got his first-ever power meter just last week, so maybe the story about him training foolishly isn't such a stretch.
Up. Literally. Poels is one of the riders to watch for 2012, as he reaches the start of his prime years and maybe makes the leap to a grand tour overall threat (he's respectable against the watch too). Ruijgh is already around, and joining them are Rafael Valls Ferri and Stefan Denifl, making for a nice U27 squad. Gustav Erik Larsson adds a veteran presence to the stage race squad, as well as some TTT muscle. And while Bozic, arguably their best sprinter, left for Astana, Kenny Van Hummel comes aboard to replace that production.
This is a pretty logical composition. The Dutch riders like Poels aren't generally graduates of the Rabo system, making them all the more attractive to build around as Vacansoleil stake their claim to the long-monopolized Dutch audience. The mix of foreign riders furthers the distinction from the more homogeneous Oranje Boys, and since that foreign presence includes top-shelf classics studs like Marcato and Leukemans, it won't (hasn't) take much for the northern fans to connect with them. Hoogie got people's attention, intentionally or not, and Vacansoleil have the quality in place to capitalize on that recognition in 2012.
Photo by Susie Hartigan for the Podium Cafe
0 recs | 48 comments
In a continuing effort to make the most obnoxious and unpopular contrarian comments ever
I have to take this opportunity to debunk one of the biggest hypes of 2011.
For the purpose of full disclosure I will admit to not being a Hoogerland fan to begin with so make of this what you will. I think the whole hero worship surrounding the Tour accident has just taken silly proportions. Yes the crash was spectacular as were his injuries. I also thought the finish of that stage and the way he had to fight his way through the podium presentation was very emotional (and I don’t tend to get emotional about this kind of stuff)……but…..
I really don’t see why this whole mythology of him as some kind of ultimate badass took on and went viral? Virtually every TdF has any number of these stories every year, the rider that gets injured and suffers on. Bad tendonitis, roadrash, bad backs and knee injuries. The struggling riders fighting not to DNF before Paris are there every year, and in most cases involving more serious injuries, they just may not have had such well televised origins. In short I think there were a mass of positive stories at Vacansoleil this year and I don’t see why that crash should make even the top 30 highlights?. I suspect the whole “population heroes” exploitation has something to do with it?
Jens - January 6, 2012
I see your point
Though I suspect that the whole situation, with the car, is a big reason to why we talk about that crash and his ride the way we do. If he had just schlecked by himself then perhaps we would look at it differently.
And of course, if we keep talking about Hoogerland in the way we do, we should not forget Flecha.
TheFigurehead - January 6, 2012
It's the image of Hoogie in the barbed wire.
You can’t imagine anyone jumping on his bike after that. In reality maybe most cyclists would, and maybe even after worse injuries, but the images aren’t as powerful. You shouldn’t underestimate Hoogie’s injuries though, he has massive scars which still affect him on the bike.
blackswangreen - January 6, 2012
Ja, I see the point
I know the images play a big role. It’s harder to feel the pain of someone with say tendonitis even if he happens to struggle through 14 stages of 200 km doing 90 rpm’s with grinding pain in the knee at every turn.
Jens - January 6, 2012
Of course.
Your point was nicely illustrated by the Dutch media, who flamed Gesink for being… well, being a loser basically, after he failed in the Tour. Mentally weak, physically frail, the works. He crashed, had a back injury, but you couldn’t see it, hence it wasn’t there.
blackswangreen - January 6, 2012
The car incident will echo for years to come, but I don’t think it’s fair on Hoogerland. He didn’t ask for it and in my opinion did not use it to pump his image or profit from it. In recent interviews he clearly states that yes, it was unfortunate and he dealt with it the way he did, but does not want to be remembered for this. He wants his sportive results and efforts to be remembered, he is not looking for martyrdom. It’s a golden egg story for any media outklet thou. They’re buildng the hero-story around it, and not Sjonnie.
Renner - January 6, 2012
Someday
I want to send someone into Jens’ store with an “I love Johnny!” shirt and a really flimsy claim for returning some merchandise. On video, of course.
Chris Fontecchio - January 6, 2012
I'm on my way!
(I’ll need some petty cash to purchase a salad spinner)
Drew Davis - January 6, 2012
But Hoogerland attacked with 56 stitches(?) in his leg. That is a big difference between Flecha and Hoogherland
Frinking - January 6, 2012
"Only" 33
VN
Aly Edge - January 6, 2012
Hoogerland has the tactical nous of a bowl of soup
That’s the biggest difference between them.
TheFigurehead - January 6, 2012
Lol. Well-put
tgsgirl - January 6, 2012
Flecha is a terrible tactician himself though.
blackswangreen - January 6, 2012
And yet
still miles better than Hoogerland.
(please don’t change Hoogie. I love the useless mental attacks)
tgsgirl - January 6, 2012
Flecha's tactics are fine
He’s just a classics guy without much of a sprint, and not quite the power to simply crush everyone.
William H - January 6, 2012
Same goes for Hoogerland, or really almost any rider in the peloton
And if you can’t rely on your sprint or your power, you have to attack. Hoogie takes it to the extreme. His Vuelta and Lombardia 2 years ago showed that he can climb pretty well. I think he was a bit overtrained last year, and then of course the barbed wire, so nothing big happened but he did keep attacking. I hope it will all fall into place this year.
Vuelta 2009:

source
tedvdw - January 6, 2012
Worst tactical blunder by Hoogie
was probably Worlds 2009 where he was in the early break, attacked solo when the peloton got close and still finished best Dutchman. D’oh! Way to waste a super day.
tedvdw - January 6, 2012
just can't help myself.
Love it when Hoogie attacks his breakaway pals. Unique style.
Uphill - January 6, 2012
there may be a reason it's unique ;)
yeehoo - January 7, 2012
Ha!
Albertina - January 6, 2012
Indeed
So he’s the perfect guy for the KOM competition.
Chris Fontecchio - January 6, 2012
I am proud of the long list of headshaking comments in the live race threads that prove
the PdC crowd were watching Johnny long before the crash.
He is fun to watch. And I believe, really, (okay, hopefully) the results will come.
paisley - January 6, 2012
+1
Uphill - January 6, 2012
De Gendt should probably get a small mentioning.
While perhaps only 107 in the CQ ranking last year, he did provide some aggressive racing and a couple of wins. He may do even better in 2012.
Uphill - January 6, 2012
No! Don't mention him again til after the VDS deadline!
tgsgirl - January 6, 2012
TdF prediction:
1. Valverde
2. Wiggo
3. De Gendt
Uphill - January 6, 2012
On which stage???
VirtKitty - January 6, 2012
Champs-Élysées
Uphill - January 6, 2012
No Tour for De Gendt this year, he's getting married
But he’ll ride both Giro and Vuelta. He says he wants to become a stageracer and give up on the Flemish classics. He also said he wans to win a couple of stages in Worldtour races. Pretty ambitious IMO.
broerie - January 6, 2012
ambitious indeed.
How is his language skill compared to Roche?
Uphill - January 6, 2012
I looked at him
And decided there wasn’t too much to say in a short format like this. But he is a useful guy.
Chris Fontecchio - January 6, 2012 via mobile
yeah, its one of the reasons I like the team. Who do you include?
Uphill - January 6, 2012
I can totally see Devolder riding himself into unconsciousness
He could well be a wonderful guy, but I also suspect he’s a bit of a chunkhead. So I can envision him going out the day after Flanders and riding a hard 200K solo.
There are plenty of pros out there who dance on the edge of over-training (looks at Stybar whilst whistling).
Drew Davis - January 6, 2012
De Gendt is similar
last year her rode together with our groupride the day before PR. He did all the work for the entire ride, rode steadily at 45 km/h on the flats and sprinted up the hills. He said he needed that to ‘open his legs’.
On sunday, we was one of the first guys who had to let go of the peloton.
broerie - January 6, 2012
This is the first year that Vacansoleil will work with a coach.
A guy like Wout Poels is really a massive talent, I hope that a little more structured training can get him into that top echelon of riders.
blackswangreen - January 6, 2012
45 on the flats? Egad.
Looks like he did a nice job of closing his legs.
Drew Davis - January 6, 2012
I'm pretty sure that photo of Crazy Johnny is mine, not Bryn Lennon's :-)
from my Giro stage 16 story.
Susie Hartigan - January 6, 2012
Wow
Probably worth checking if Getty haven’t stolen your photo and added it to their catalog.
tedvdw - January 6, 2012
Do you know how I would go about checking on that?
I’d certainly be curious to find out.
Susie Hartigan - January 6, 2012
No idea
but if Chris who wrote this post added the photo via PdC’s official Getty catalogue photo add-in, then yeah, it probably happened. I say ask Chris.
tedvdw - January 6, 2012
"Did Chris tell you that by chance? Chris"
(shakes fist at Chris)
Drew Davis - January 6, 2012
Ah nope
I took it from archives. It was late at night. Will change the tag…
Chris Fontecchio - January 6, 2012
Mystery solved :-)
Damn, and here I was getting all set to be flattered that someone thought enough of one of my pics to try to steal it ;-)
Susie Hartigan - January 6, 2012
Lagutin’s 15 place overall in the Vuelta, deserves some mentioning, I think.
holmovka - January 6, 2012
And the fact he's one of the hardest-workers in the peloton.
I love Hoogerland. When Vino first made his comeback, Hoogerland chased down every attack that he was within 30km of – like personal minder.
His 09 Vuelta, where he and Rein Taaramae tried to get in the break pretty much every day for a fortnight.
His Lombardia where he was in the early break, and the counter, and then was in the chasing pack in the last few k.
The day early in the year when he attacked alone off the front of the peloton, to bridge across to a doomed break, who he then attacked after about 12 seconds of rest.
I also love De Gendt for the same reasons. His win in Paris-Nice was perhaps my favourite of the year; the work by those 3 riders was great, such a perfect counter-attack. He also seemed to get a bit of a fright at me shouting to him at the Tour of Britain in Paisley – 100 people trying to get Cavendish’s signature, and I was saying bye to Antony Charteau and shouting across to Thomas.
Borut Bozic will be missed I think, because he is so erratic. He will get 1 random good win per year. As a result the team have to back him in the sprints if it’s anything other than flat & straight. Getting Kenny VH gives them another sprinter, but he’s completely different – you can only back him on the perfect flats, AND you know he’s getting you 3rd at best. Bozic was a total wild card, capable of getting 1st or 20th.
I have long liked Rafael Valls, ever since I used him as a spoof thread topic to explain to people why Geraint Thomas wasn’t going to win the Tour White jersey in 2010.
A team full of riders that it’s easy to like, guys that make the racing interesting, and the fact that they cobble it together into decent rankings is a bonus.
ike2112 - January 6, 2012
+100!
holmovka - January 6, 2012
+1
yeehoo - January 7, 2012
si si
Uphill - January 7, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Podium Cafe to post a comment.